by pegasi-ai · MCP Server · ★ 383
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Runtime security for OpenClaw agents. Scan, fix, monitor.
| Stars | 383 |
| Forks | 49 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 36.55/100 |
| Open Issues | 11 |
| Last Updated | 2026-04-21 |
| Created | 2023-04-13 |
| Platforms | browser, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~14061k |
These tools work well together with reins for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a reins alternative? If you're comparing reins with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
The open agent control plane. Govern autonomous AI agents with pre-execution policy enforcement, approval gate
gemini drawing MCP & skill through browser, can be used in openclaw or any agent that supports MCP. Gemini画图 M
Runtime policy enforcement for AI agents. Cryptographic audit trail, human-in-the-loop approvals, kill switch.
Anti-detection browser server for AI agents — REST API wrapping Camoufox engine with OpenClaw plugin support
Agent orchestration & security template featuring MCP tool building, agent2agent workflows, mechanistic interp
Security scanner MCP server for AI coding agents. Prompt injection firewall, package hallucination detection (
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
reins is Runtime security for OpenClaw agents. Scan, fix, monitor.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 383 GitHub stars.
reins is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent-observability, agent-security, ai-monitoring.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the reins GitHub repository at github.com/pegasi-ai/reins. The project has 383 stars and 49 forks, indicating an active community.
reins is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to reins on Agent Skills Hub include cordum, gemini-skill, Aegis. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.