In-Memoria — security grade SAFE, quality 73/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 73/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by pi22by7 · MCP Server · ★ 170

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is In-Memoria safe to install? View the security audit →

About In-Memoria

In Memoria Giving AI coding assistants a memory that actually persists. Quick Demo Watch In Memoria in action: learning a codebase, providing instant context, and routing features to files. The Problem: Session Amnesia You know the drill. You fire up Claude, Copilot, or Cursor to help with your codebase. You explain your architecture. You describe your patterns. You outline your conventions. The AI gets it, helps you out, and everything's great. Then you close the window. Next session? Complete amnesia. You're explaining the same architectural decisions again. The same naming conventions. The same "no, we don't use classes here, we use functional composition" for the fifteenth time. Every AI coding session starts from scratch. This isn't just annoying, it's inefficient. These tools re-analyze your codebase on every interaction, burning tokens and time. They give

ai-agentsai-toolscodebase-intelligencedeveloper-toolslocal-firstmcp-serverpersistent-memory

Quick Facts

Stars170
Forks30
LanguageRust
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score72.910014578617/100
Open Issues2
Last Updated2025-12-23
Created2025-08-16
Platformsmcp, rust
Est. Tokens~138k

In-Memoria alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a In-Memoria alternative? If you're comparing In-Memoria with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • roam-code by Cranot · ⭐ 517

    Local codebase intelligence CLI + MCP server for AI coding agents: SQLite code graph, 28 languages, 287 comman

  • mcpproxy-go by smart-mcp-proxy · ⭐ 383

    Supercharge AI Agents, Safely

  • Ori-Mnemos by aayoawoyemi · ⭐ 328

    Local-first persistent agentic memory powered by Recursive Memory Harness (RMH). Open source must win.

  • roampal-core by roampal-ai · ⭐ 51

    Outcome-based persistent memory MCP server for Claude Code and OpenCode. Good advice promoted, bad advice demo

  • idea-reality-mcp by mnemox-ai · ⭐ 817

    Pre-build reality check for AI coding agents. Scans GitHub, HN, npm, PyPI, Product Hunt. MCP server. 290+ star

  • vestige by samvallad33 · ⭐ 645

    The memory + security kernel for AI agents. Strata: a signed append-only log, receipts on every write, exact-h

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Rust Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is In-Memoria?

In-Memoria is Persistent Intelligence Infrastructure for AI Agents. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 170 GitHub stars.

What programming language is In-Memoria written in?

In-Memoria is primarily written in Rust. It covers topics such as ai-agents, ai-tools, codebase-intelligence.

How do I install or use In-Memoria?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the In-Memoria GitHub repository at github.com/pi22by7/In-Memoria. The project has 170 stars and 30 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does In-Memoria use?

In-Memoria is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to In-Memoria?

The top alternatives to In-Memoria on Agent Skills Hub include roam-code, mcpproxy-go, Ori-Mnemos. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools