pwno-mcp: what it is & alternatives

by pwno-io · MCP Server · ★ 280

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 67/100

None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.

The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.

mcpmcp-serverpwnpwnopwno-mcp

Quick Facts

Stars280
Forks24
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
Quality Score67/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-03-12
Created2025-07-18
Platformsmcp, python
Est. Tokens~54k

About pwno-mcp

stateful system for autonomous pwn and binary research, designed for LLM agents. Overview runs GDB + pwndbg in an isolated environment and exposes stateful debugging, exploit I/O, and helper tooling over MCP for agentic coding clients.

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with pwno-mcp for enhanced workflows:

pwno-mcp alternative? Top 3 similar tools

Looking for a pwno-mcp alternative? If you're comparing pwno-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 3 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • lisa.py by ant4g0nist · ⭐ 756

    LLDB MCP Integration + other helpful commands

  • ctf-super-hub by asdfgh1445 · ⭐ 827

    面向小白用户的 CTF / 逆向 Skills 整合包:自动分流、头脑风暴、教学模式、比赛模式、只提示模式

  • recurse by Recurse-Labs · ⭐ 295

    AI Native IDE for reverse engineering

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools