Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 106 |
| Forks | 25 |
| Language | Go |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 68/100 |
| Open Issues | 81 |
| Last Updated | 2026-02-05 |
| Created | 2023-12-24 |
| Platforms | go |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
Reviewbot - Empower Your Code Quality with Self-Hosted Automated Analysis and Review 中文 Reviewbot assists you in rapidly establishing a self-hosted code analysis and review service, supporting multiple languages and coding standards.
Looking for a reviewbot alternative? If you're comparing reviewbot with other ai tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
An AI-powered GitHub code review tool that uses LLMs to detect high-confidence, high-impact issues—such as sec
DeepCode extension for Visual Studio Code
The code quality toolkit for the agentic AI era. Find dead code, clones, and scaffolding across 15 languages.
Local codebase intelligence CLI + MCP server for AI coding agents: SQLite code graph, 28 languages, 287 comman
The missing linter and lsp for AI coding assistants. Validate CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, SKILL.md, hooks, MCP. Plug
Self-hosted AI code reviewer with indexed PR reviews, walkthroughs, vulnerability scanning, dependency graphs,
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: