jev-webmcp-extension — security grade SAFE, quality 73/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 73/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by sdras · MCP Server · ★ 125

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is jev-webmcp-extension safe to install? View the security audit →

About jev-webmcp-extension

Jev × WebMCP Chrome Extension A Chrome extension that uses Jev, TypeSafe's System One model, to select and populate WebMCP tool calls from user input. The side panel discovers tools exposed by the current page and displays predicted calls, confidence scores, and latency as the user types. Tool selection is derived from the page's schemas, without site-specific configuration. How schema conversion works WebMCP exposes named tools with descriptions, parameter schemas, enums, and annotations. Jev accepts state and typed questions (Choice, Score, Noul) and returns typed answers with probabilities. It answers the questions in parallel and does not generate text. The panel converts tool schemas into questions as follows: an

chromeextensionextension-chromejevwebmcp

Quick Facts

Stars125
Forks7
LanguageJavaScript
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseApache-2.0
Quality Score73.2025054069738/100
Last Updated2026-09-20
Created2026-09-19
Platformsbrowser, mcp, node
Est. Tokens~14k

jev-webmcp-extension alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a jev-webmcp-extension alternative? If you're comparing jev-webmcp-extension with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • doma by dom-actions · ⭐ 137

    The open-source of DomA, an AI automation agent for the browser.

  • phi by pulseaiclub · ⭐ 524

    a coding agent, rpc plugin, sub-agents, hashline edits, and mcp

  • Maple by tw93 · ⭐ 511

    🍁 Hide the bookmark bar, use Maple Bookmarks to surf smoothly.

  • awesome-typesafe by AbdelStark · ⭐ 400

    A curated list of official resources and community projects for TypeSafe, System One models, and Jev.

  • tinystruct by tinystruct · ⭐ 359

    A lightweight, modular Java application framework for web and CLI development, designed for AI integra

  • openjev-sglang by ekzhang · ⭐ 337

    Jev-compatible API endpoint based on open models (prefill-only)

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular JavaScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is jev-webmcp-extension?

jev-webmcp-extension is A small extension that demos the combination of Jev x WebMCP. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 125 GitHub stars.

What programming language is jev-webmcp-extension written in?

jev-webmcp-extension is primarily written in JavaScript. It covers topics such as chrome, extension, extension-chrome.

How do I install or use jev-webmcp-extension?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the jev-webmcp-extension GitHub repository at github.com/sdras/jev-webmcp-extension. The project has 125 stars and 7 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does jev-webmcp-extension use?

jev-webmcp-extension is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to jev-webmcp-extension?

The top alternatives to jev-webmcp-extension on Agent Skills Hub include doma, phi, Maple. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools