Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 521 |
| Forks | 28 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 56/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-04 |
| Created | 2023-07-26 |
| Platforms | browser, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
English | 中文 Maple Bookmarks Hide the bookmark bar, use Maple Bookmarks to surf smoothly. Introduction The bookmarks bar can occupy the browsing window and affect concentration, so I often hide it. However, this makes accessing bookmarks inconvenient. Therefore, I developed the Maple Bookmarks extension.
Looking for a Maple alternative? If you're comparing Maple with other ai tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
DeepSeek Web browser extension: AI agent workspace with MCP tools, memory, Skills, automation, web search, and
Browser automation clicks buttons. OpenTabs calls APIs.
Communicate with external applications of your OS through a toolbar button or context menu item.
let any ai agent use the local browser
A powerful OCR extension with area selection tool and more
Speeds up large AI chats by loading only the most recent messages, keeping long conversations fast and respons
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: