by sliamh11 · Agent Tool · ★ 51
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/sliamh11/Deus.gitTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
Flagged: opens a tunnel service. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 51 |
| Forks | 6 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 71/100 |
| Open Issues | 60 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-30 |
| Created | 2026-03-21 |
| Platforms | claude-code, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
A personal AI that understands you - not just recalls things you've said. It learns what you care about, how you think, and what you'll actually find useful. The longer you use it, the more it feels like it gets you. Everything runs on your computer. Your data stays yours.
Looking for a Deus alternative? If you're comparing Deus with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Outcome-based persistent memory MCP server for Claude Code and OpenCode. Good advice promoted, bad advice demo
Persistent memory for AI coding agents
A local dual-layer memory pattern for AI agents: a compact, human-readable markdown index paired with semantic
Cognitive memory database for AI agents — consolidates duplicates, detects contradictions, fades stale memorie
Give your AI assistant memory, skills, and autonomy. Persistent memory, integration skills, and autonomous wor
Cognitive memory engine for AI agents — temporal decay, contradiction detection, autonomous consolidation, kno
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: