jevpilot — security grade SAFE, quality 52/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 52/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by standardagents · AI Tool · ★ 106

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is jevpilot safe to install? View the security audit →

About jevpilot

JevPilot https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4baef58e-54ef-4d17-9982-353a0b6e6f45 A demo project showing Tesla Autopilot-like behavior using Jev by TypeSafe AI. Sign in with Standard Agents for $0.25 of free Jev play credit. Joining the early-access list is optional. The hosted endpoint requires a valid login session. The browser sends its secure, HttpOnly session cookie; the Jev API key stays on the server. Interstate 08: start in Millbrook, turn onto the signed on-ramp, merge, cruise, and exit into Cedar Town for the final stop. How it works Jev receives compact tables of eligible paths, road boundaries, nearby traffic, signals, stop memory, and destination guidance. Shared table values are sent once, and instructions include only relevant situations. The road graph is sent only when choosing an alternative route after staying more than 30 meters off course for six seconds. Detailed geometry and control calculations stay local. The simulator samples fresh steering-and-speed combinations for each decision. On the road, it favors paths that keep the whole car on asphalt.

Quick Facts

Stars106
Forks16
LanguageJavaScript
CategoryAI Tool
Quality Score52.0218228879357/100
Last Updated2026-09-17
Created2026-09-17
Platformsnode
Est. Tokens~13k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with jevpilot for enhanced workflows:

  • jev-browser — semantic(0.21)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (57%)
  • claude-d3js-skill — semantic(0.18)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (51%)
  • advocaat — semantic(0.20)+complementary+similar_pop+shared_platform (47%)

jevpilot alternative? Top 4 similar tools

Looking for a jevpilot alternative? If you're comparing jevpilot with other ai tool tools, these 4 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • SciToolAgent by HICAI-ZJU · ⭐ 416

    SciToolAgent: A Knowledge Graph-Driven Scientific Agent for Multi-Tool Integration

  • redesigned-pancake by Sfedfcv · ⭐ 256

    Skip to content github / docs Code Issues 80 Pull requests 35 Discussions Actions Projects 2 Security Insights

  • claude-code-voice-skill by abracadabra50 · ⭐ 169

    Skill to talk to Claude about your projects over the phone

  • maui-skills by davidortinau · ⭐ 163

    .NET MAUI skills for GitHub Copilot and Claude Code

More AI Tool Tools

Explore other popular ai tool tools:

View all AI Tool tools →

Popular JavaScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is jevpilot?

jevpilot is A playable Three.js driving simulator with Jev-powered autopilot. It is categorized as a AI Tool with 106 GitHub stars.

What programming language is jevpilot written in?

jevpilot is primarily written in JavaScript.

How do I install or use jevpilot?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the jevpilot GitHub repository at github.com/standardagents/jevpilot. The project has 106 stars and 16 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to jevpilot?

The top alternatives to jevpilot on Agent Skills Hub include SciToolAgent, redesigned-pancake, claude-code-voice-skill. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse AI Tool tools