by sturdy-dev · AI Tool · ★ 326
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 326 |
| Forks | 35 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 68/100 |
| Open Issues | 18 |
| Last Updated | 2023-04-06 |
| Created | 2022-05-20 |
| Platforms | node |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
🔮 Codeball — AI Code Review Codeball is a code review AI that scores Pull Requests on a grade from 0 (needs careful review) to 1 (you should merge this!) Use Codeball to add labels to help you focus, to auto approve PRs, and more. The Codeball action is easy to use (sane defaults), and is highly customizeable to fit your workflow when needed.
Looking for a codeball-action alternative? If you're comparing codeball-action with other ai tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Free, AI PR reviewer that runs entirely in GitHub Actions. No hosting required.
An AI-powered GitHub code review tool that uses LLMs to detect high-confidence, high-impact issues—such as sec
The self-hosted AI workflow automation platform for Git repositories.
Context-aware AI reviewer for Pull Requests. Instant summary, line-by-line comments, title generation and more
AI writes code. This automates everything else · 24 plugins · 49 agents · 44 skills · for Claude Code, OpenCod
🚀 AI-powered code review tool for GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket Cloud, Bitbucket Server, Azure DevOps and Gitea —
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: