by tihanyin · Agent Tool · ★ 111
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/tihanyin/REx-skill && cd REx-skill
git clone https://github.com/tihanyin/REx-skill 2>/dev/null || git -C REx-skill pull
Taken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 111 |
| Forks | 17 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 61/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-23 |
| Created | 2026-09-23 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
REx@Skill Reverse Engineering eXecution Skill Find the defects in a compiled binary — and prove them. Seven subagents, one evidence tree, and a pinned toolchain so two runs are comparable. <img src="images/tools/capa.png" width="38"
These tools work well together with REx-skill for enhanced workflows:
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: