youtube-sponsor-detection — security grade SAFE, quality 58/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 58/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by trungdq88 · AI Tool · ★ 75

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is youtube-sponsor-detection safe to install? View the security audit →

About youtube-sponsor-detection

Sponsor Skip Skips sponsor reads on YouTube. A Chrome extension finds each read with Jev (TypeSafe's System One model) and jumps past it while you watch; a small web app does the same for a pasted link. Code owns every timestamp: Jev only ever names a transcript line or answers yes/no about what it heard. You need a TypeSafe API key. Smart and Listen modes also need a Deepgram key for speech-to-text. Chrome extension Clone this repo. Open , turn on Developer mode, click Load unpacked and pick the folder. Click the extension's icon and paste your TypeSafe key. Transcript mode works from there; add a Deepgram key to try the Smart or Listen modes. Open any YouTube video. A panel appears bottom-right with the reads found, a Skip button per read, the auto-skip toggle, the running cost and, in the audio modes, what is being heard and a log of every decision. Modes The transcript finds each read and its end; the audio is listened to only around each read, and once Jev agrees a read is playin

Quick Facts

Stars75
Forks11
LanguageJavaScript
CategoryAI Tool
Quality Score57.5181039945109/100
Last Updated2026-09-18
Created2026-09-17
Platformsnode
Est. Tokens~15k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with youtube-sponsor-detection for enhanced workflows:

  • jev-browser — semantic(0.20)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (57%)
  • awesome-jev-projects — semantic(0.18)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (56%)

youtube-sponsor-detection alternative? Top 3 similar tools

Looking for a youtube-sponsor-detection alternative? If you're comparing youtube-sponsor-detection with other ai tool tools, these 3 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • redesigned-pancake by Sfedfcv · ⭐ 256

    Skip to content github / docs Code Issues 80 Pull requests 35 Discussions Actions Projects 2 Security Insights

  • claude-code-voice-skill by abracadabra50 · ⭐ 169

    Skill to talk to Claude about your projects over the phone

  • maui-skills by davidortinau · ⭐ 163

    .NET MAUI skills for GitHub Copilot and Claude Code

More AI Tool Tools

Explore other popular ai tool tools:

View all AI Tool tools →

Popular JavaScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is youtube-sponsor-detection?

youtube-sponsor-detection is Detect youtube sponsor segment with live audio and transcript powered by Jev. It is categorized as a AI Tool with 75 GitHub stars.

What programming language is youtube-sponsor-detection written in?

youtube-sponsor-detection is primarily written in JavaScript.

How do I install or use youtube-sponsor-detection?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the youtube-sponsor-detection GitHub repository at github.com/trungdq88/youtube-sponsor-detection. The project has 75 stars and 11 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to youtube-sponsor-detection?

The top alternatives to youtube-sponsor-detection on Agent Skills Hub include redesigned-pancake, claude-code-voice-skill, maui-skills. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse AI Tool tools