by v587d · Agent Tool · ★ 13
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 13 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 63/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-07-01 |
| Created | 2026-06-26 |
| Platforms | browser, gemini |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
NanoBanana — Gemini Image Generator Skill for AI Agents
Looking for a nano-banana alternative? If you're comparing nano-banana with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Anti-detection browser MCP server for AI agents — navigate, interact, and automate the web without getting blo
Vendor-neutral MCP configuration manager — one CLI to add, toggle, and audit MCP servers and skills across eve
Work with web-enabled agents quickly — whether running a quick task or bootstrapping a full-stack product.
Travel MCP server + CLI for AI assistants — flights, hotels, trains, cars, ferries, price alerts. No API keys,
A browser agent with a Google Chrome extension that can work in your browser. Based on Google Gemini 2.5 compu
An MCP server that integrates with gpt-image-1 & Gemini imagen4 model for text-to-image generation services
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: