total-agent-memory — security grade SAFE, quality 66/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 66/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by vbcherepanov · MCP Server · ★ 68

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is total-agent-memory safe to install? View the security audit →

About total-agent-memory

total-agent-memory The only memory layer that learns how you work — not just what you said. Persistent, local memory for AI coding agents: Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, any MCP client. Temporal knowledge graph · procedural memory · AST codebase ingest · cross-project analogy · 3D WebGL visualization. []() []() []() [![Docker GHC

agent-memoryai-memoryclaude-codeclaude-code-mcpclaude-code-pluginclaude-memorycodex-clideveloper-toolsknowledge-graphknowledge-management

Quick Facts

Stars68
Forks17
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score66.4134656787938/100
Last Updated2026-09-15
Created2026-02-16
Platformsclaude-code, cli, codex, mcp, python
Est. Tokens~25k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with total-agent-memory for enhanced workflows:

  • fireworks-skill-memory — semantic(0.32)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (61%)
  • claude-remember — semantic(0.39)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (59%)

total-agent-memory alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a total-agent-memory alternative? If you're comparing total-agent-memory with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • roampal-core by roampal-ai · ⭐ 50

    Outcome-based persistent memory MCP server for Claude Code and OpenCode. Good advice promoted, bad advice demo

  • Ori-Mnemos by aayoawoyemi · ⭐ 324

    Local-first persistent agentic memory powered by Recursive Memory Harness (RMH). Open source must win.

  • Zikkaron by amanhij · ⭐ 62

    Biologically-inspired persistent memory engine for Claude Code. 26 cognitive subsystems, Hopfield networks, pr

  • omega-memory by omega-memory · ⭐ 218

    Persistent memory for AI coding agents

  • mengram by alibaizhanov · ⭐ 195

    Human-like memory for AI agents — semantic, episodic & procedural. Experience-driven procedures that learn fro

  • pdf-mcp by jztan · ⭐ 136

    An MCP server that gives your AI agent agentic RAG over your PDFs, one file or a whole folder: hybrid semantic

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is total-agent-memory?

total-agent-memory is Persistent local memory for AI coding agents — Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, any MCP client. Temporal knowledge graph, procedural memory, AST codebase ingest, cross-project analogy. LongMemEval R@5 . It is categorized as a MCP Server with 68 GitHub stars.

What programming language is total-agent-memory written in?

total-agent-memory is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent-memory, ai-memory, claude-code.

How do I install or use total-agent-memory?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the total-agent-memory GitHub repository at github.com/vbcherepanov/total-agent-memory. The project has 68 stars and 17 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does total-agent-memory use?

total-agent-memory is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to total-agent-memory?

The top alternatives to total-agent-memory on Agent Skills Hub include roampal-core, Ori-Mnemos, Zikkaron. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools