by vuphongle · Agent Tool · ★ 114
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 114 |
| Forks | 87 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 74/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-08-29 |
| Created | 2026-08-13 |
| Platforms | cli, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
oss-pr-reviewer AI-powered CLI for reviewing GitHub pull requests, detecting potential bugs, security risks, regressions, and missing tests, with structured Markdown reports for open-source maintainers. Overview assists a maintainer with a focused review of one GitHub pull request.
Looking for a oss-pr-reviewer alternative? If you're comparing oss-pr-reviewer with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Open source AI coding platform with Web IDE, multi-agent system, 37+ tools, MCP protocol. MIT licensed.
An AI-powered GitHub code review tool that uses LLMs to detect high-confidence, high-impact issues—such as sec
The self-hosted AI workflow automation platform for Git repositories.
Node.js/TypeScript MCP server for Atlassian Bitbucket. Enables AI systems (LLMs) to interact with workspaces,
MCP Fusion - The framework for AI-native MCP servers.
MCP Server for Facebook ADs Library - Get instant answers from FB's ad library
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: