Anti-Autoresearch — security grade SAFE, quality 60/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 60/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by wanshuiyin · MCP Server · ★ 157

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is Anti-Autoresearch safe to install? View the security audit →

About Anti-Autoresearch

Anti-Autoresearch 🛡️ · · · · · · · · 🔬 The field has tolerated unreliable autoresearch long enough — Anti-Autoresearch is the read that finally catches it. 天下苦 autoresearch 久矣 —— Anti-Autoresearc

ai-generated-contentai-researchai-scientistarisautoresearchclaudeclaude-codeclaude-code-skillscodexforensics

Quick Facts

Stars157
Forks8
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score60.4427701536319/100
Last Updated2026-09-28
Created2026-06-26
Platformsclaude-code, codex, mcp, python
Est. Tokens~22k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with Anti-Autoresearch for enhanced workflows:

  • PhD-Zero — semantic(0.34)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (71%)
  • Auto-Research-Skills — semantic(0.29)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (65%)
  • PaperOrchestra — semantic(0.27)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (64%)

Anti-Autoresearch alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a Anti-Autoresearch alternative? If you're comparing Anti-Autoresearch with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • Overture by SixHq · ⭐ 641

    Overture is an open-source, locally running web interface delivered as an MCP (Model Context Protocol) server

  • ResearchClawBench by InternScience · ⭐ 264

    🦞 ResearchClawBench: Evaluating AI Agents for Automated Research from Re-Discovery to New-Discovery

  • de-anthropocentric-research-engine by yogsoth-ai · ⭐ 504

    A 267-skill research graph in pure markdown — 51 research operations built from 216 single-purpose steps, comp

  • AutoResearch-SibylSystem by Sibyl-Research-Team · ⭐ 281

    Fully Autonomous AI Research System with Self-Evolution, built natively on Claude Code

  • De-Anthropocentric-Research-Engine by Pthahnix · ⭐ 229

    De-Anthropocentric Research Engine — AI-powered academic research automation with deep literature survey, gap

  • cai by ad-si · ⭐ 204

    User friendly CLI tool for AI tasks. Stop thinking about LLMs and prompts, start getting results!

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Anti-Autoresearch?

Anti-Autoresearch is Don't trust an autoresearch paper at face value. Reviewer-side integrity forensics (self-consistency + fabrication), deterministic verdict. 61 signals: 46 integrity hack-patterns (families A–H, verdic. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 157 GitHub stars.

What programming language is Anti-Autoresearch written in?

Anti-Autoresearch is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as ai-generated-content, ai-research, ai-scientist.

How do I install or use Anti-Autoresearch?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the Anti-Autoresearch GitHub repository at github.com/wanshuiyin/Anti-Autoresearch. The project has 157 stars and 8 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does Anti-Autoresearch use?

Anti-Autoresearch is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to Anti-Autoresearch?

The top alternatives to Anti-Autoresearch on Agent Skills Hub include Overture, ResearchClawBench, de-anthropocentric-research-engine. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools