by wgpsec · MCP Server · ★ 595
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
一款帮助云租户发现和测试云上风险、增强云上防护能力的综合性开源工具
| Stars | 595 |
| Forks | 56 |
| Language | Go |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 38.9/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2026-02-03 |
| Created | 2024-12-21 |
| Platforms | go, mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~213k |
These tools work well together with cloudsword for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a cloudsword alternative? If you're comparing cloudsword with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A growing collection of MCP servers bringing offensive security tools to AI assistants. Nmap, Ghidra, Nuclei,
MCP server for VirusTotal API — analyze URLs, files, IPs, and domains with comprehensive security reports, rel
MCP for Security: A collection of Model Context Protocol servers for popular security tools like SQLMap, FFUF,
AI-powered subdomain enumeration tool with local LLM analysis via Ollama - 100% private, zero API costs
EVA is an AI-assisted penetration testing agent that enhances offensive security workflows by providing struct
A Test Project for a Network Security-oriented LLM Tool Emulating AutoGPT
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
cloudsword is 一款帮助云租户发现和测试云上风险、增强云上防护能力的综合性开源工具. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 595 GitHub stars.
cloudsword is primarily written in Go. It covers topics such as alibaba-cloud, cloudsecurity, cybersecurity.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the cloudsword GitHub repository at github.com/wgpsec/cloudsword. The project has 595 stars and 56 forks, indicating an active community.
cloudsword is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to cloudsword on Agent Skills Hub include mcp-security-hub, mcp-virustotal, mcp-for-security. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.