by whitequeen306 · Agent Tool · ★ 15
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 15 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 59/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-07-22 |
| Created | 2026-06-16 |
| Platforms | claude-code, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
One-command AI code quality pipeline: review, security, tests, performance, simplify & cleanup. Health scores, CI gate. For Cursor, Claude Code, Qoder, Trae.
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: