by yifanzz · Claude Skill · ★ 166
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
npm install -g claude-code-boost
npm install -g claude-code-boost && ccb installTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 166 |
| Forks | 24 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Claude Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 73/100 |
| Open Issues | 7 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-21 |
| Created | 2025-07-17 |
| Platforms | claude-code, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
Claude Code Boost Smart hooks for Claude Code that reduce friction and keep quality high. Auto-approve safe dev operations (less clicking, more coding) Nudge/run tests before ending sessions when changes warrant it Optional desktop notifications for long-running tasks Quick Start See what gets auto-approved and blocked in the sections below.
Looking for a claude-code-boost alternative? If you're comparing claude-code-boost with other claude skill tools, these 2 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Repo for the Claude Code Marketplace to use with the Claude for Life Sciences Launch. This will continue to ho
Report issues related to MCP integration with Claude here.
Explore other popular claude skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: