by zjunlp · Agent Tool · ★ 24
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 24 |
| Forks | 6 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 62/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-05 |
| Created | 2026-09-20 |
| Platforms | node |
| Est. Tokens | ~20k |
Acta: A Decision-Centric Runtime for Agents
These tools work well together with JevLoop for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a JevLoop alternative? If you're comparing JevLoop with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
TypeSafe Jev for DeepSeek Harness, the Model Context Protocol, and plain Node: typed judgments instead of pros
Jev / TypeSafe System One 中文精选列表：官方资料、SDK、爆款应用、Agent 工具、开源复现与独立评测，附中文上手指南，每日自动收录 GitHub 热门项目。
High-throughput synthetic and pretraining dataset sifter for TypeSafe Jev. Rust streaming core, Parquet and JS
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
Ask your house a question, get a number back. Home Assistant integration for TypeSafe Jev: typed answers as se
Open-source alternative to TypeSafe's Jev: a System One style model layer that gives typed, calibrated decisio
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: