by zou-group · Agent Tool · ★ 242
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 242 |
| Forks | 27 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 70/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2025-06-10 |
| Created | 2024-06-14 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~914k |
AvaTaR: Optimizing LLM Agents for Tool Usage via Contrastive Reasoning (NeurIPS 2024) NeurIPS paper | DSPy Implementation AvaTaR is a novel and automatic framework that optimizes an LLM agent to effectively use the provided tools and improve its performance on a given task/domain.
These tools work well together with avatar for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a avatar alternative? If you're comparing avatar with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Curated collection of tools for agentic LLMs in Emacs
Expose llms-txt to IDEs for development
TxAgent: An AI Agent for Therapeutic Reasoning Across a Universe of Tools
kani (カニ) is a highly hackable microframework for tool-calling language models. (NLP-OSS @ EMNLP 2023)
[ICLR'25] BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation Towards AGI
Real-time behavioral enforcement for Claude Code. Monitors AI actions, detects violations, and interrupts misb
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: