by mims-harvard · Agent Tool · ★ 655
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/mims-harvard/TxAgent.git
pip install txagentTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 655 |
| Forks | 103 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 71/100 |
| Open Issues | 22 |
| Last Updated | 2025-07-30 |
| Created | 2025-03-01 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~3796k |
TxAgent: An AI agent for therapeutic reasoning across a universe of tools Shanghua Gao, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/richard-zhu-4236901a7/"
Looking for a TxAgent alternative? If you're comparing TxAgent with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
[ICLR'25] BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation Towards AGI
A working pattern for SSE-based MCP clients and servers
(NeurIPS 2024) AvaTaR: Optimizing LLM Agents for Tool Usage via Contrastive Reasoning
Desktop AI Assistant powered by GPT-6, GPT-5, Gemini, Claude, Grok, Ollama, DeepSeek, Perplexity, and more - c
A simple yet powerful agent framework for personal assistants, designed to enable intelligent interaction, mul
The python library for research and development in NLP, multimodal LLMs, Agents, ML, Knowledge Graphs, and mor
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: