jev-forge — security grade SAFE, quality 63/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 63/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by zwliJay · AI Tool · ★ 127

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is jev-forge safe to install? View the security audit →

About jev-forge

JevForge An end-to-end toolkit for synthesizing decision data, training calibrated candidate scorers, evaluating them, and serving Jev-compatible inference for interactive web decisions. Data synthesis · training + calibration · evaluation · Jev-compatible serving Interactive demo · HF model · HF dataset · Dataset format · Chinese · Design · RLCD results JevForge turns structured decisions into one reproducible pipeline. Give it a state, a question, and a candidate set; it builds training records, trains and calibrates a scorer, evaluates fixed splits, and serves a complete probability distribution through a Jev-compatible API. , , and ordered questions all use the same decision path. Its first proving ground is the interaction loop at the heart of Jev-style systems: choosing the next click, navigation target, form control, route, or escalation from the elements currently available on a page. Results Results use fixed,

Quick Facts

Stars127
Forks13
LanguagePython
CategoryAI Tool
Quality Score63.333022491971/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-09-23
Created2026-09-19
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~15k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with jev-forge for enhanced workflows:

  • Verdict-open-jev — semantic(0.22)+complementary+shared_fw(huggingface)+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (66%)
  • open-alternative-jev — semantic(0.20)+complementary+shared_fw(huggingface)+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (65%)

jev-forge alternative? Top 4 similar tools

Looking for a jev-forge alternative? If you're comparing jev-forge with other ai tool tools, these 4 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • SciToolAgent by HICAI-ZJU · ⭐ 428

    SciToolAgent: A Knowledge Graph-Driven Scientific Agent for Multi-Tool Integration

  • redesigned-pancake by Sfedfcv · ⭐ 266

    Skip to content github / docs Code Issues 80 Pull requests 35 Discussions Actions Projects 2 Security Insights

  • claude-code-voice-skill by abracadabra50 · ⭐ 169

    Skill to talk to Claude about your projects over the phone

  • maui-skills by davidortinau · ⭐ 163

    .NET MAUI skills for GitHub Copilot and Claude Code

More AI Tool Tools

Explore other popular ai tool tools:

View all AI Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is jev-forge?

jev-forge is An open training and inference stack for Jev-style decision models. Train models to score dynamic candidate branches from a shared prefix, with support for high-cardinality choice, calibration, and f. It is categorized as a AI Tool with 127 GitHub stars.

What programming language is jev-forge written in?

jev-forge is primarily written in Python.

How do I install or use jev-forge?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the jev-forge GitHub repository at github.com/zwliJay/jev-forge. The project has 127 stars and 13 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to jev-forge?

The top alternatives to jev-forge on Agent Skills Hub include SciToolAgent, redesigned-pancake, claude-code-voice-skill. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse AI Tool tools