by 9pings · Agent Tool · ★ 24
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 24 |
| Forks | 3 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 68/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-05 |
| Created | 2026-09-22 |
| Platforms | node |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
Super fast Jev like server in JS, model agnostic, working with any OpenAI compatible endpoint
These tools work well together with notjev for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a notjev alternative? If you're comparing notjev with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Open-source alternative to TypeSafe's Jev: a System One style model layer that gives typed, calibrated decisio
OpenJev: open-source, local alternative to Jev. System-One decision models: typed questions in, calibrated pro
Local proxy that learns your app's typed LLM decisions and answers them with a Laya head. Jev and OpenAI compa
Meet JevEmbed — turn embeddings into decisions. Choose, score, and judge with your choice of embedding model.
🔥🔥 Papers, open reproductions and independent evaluations behind System One models and Jev.
🚀🚀 A 0.8B JEV-like multimodal model playing GUI games directly from raw pixels.
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: