Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/OmniJev/PlayJev && cd PlayJevTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 56 |
| Forks | 5 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 57/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-24 |
| Created | 2026-09-17 |
| Platforms | browser, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
PlayJev: A Multimodal JEV-Like Model for Small Games <img alt="Jev Syste
Looking for a PlayJev alternative? If you're comparing PlayJev with other ai tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
OpenJev: open-source, local alternative to Jev. System-One decision models: typed questions in, calibrated pro
OmniAgent (ICML 2026): the first native omni-modal agent for active video perception — a 7B agent that beats Q
Open-source alternative to TypeSafe's Jev: a System One style model layer that gives typed, calibrated decisio
A community directory of projects built on Jev, TypeSafe AI's System One model.
Typed decisions with TypeSafe's Jev, the first System One model
A curated list of Jev use cases, projects, SDKs, and resources. Jev is TypeSafe AI's System One model for fast
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: