academic-humanizer — security grade SAFE, quality 67/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 67/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by AIScientists-Dev · Claude Skill · ★ 863

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is academic-humanizer safe to install? View the security audit →

About academic-humanizer

      Why we built this Some of us write a lot of papers and grant proposals, and our team started using AI to help with drafts. The problem is that AI-assisted drafts come out generic and verbose, with "In recent years..." openers, inflated phrasing, and over-long sentences. They also drift from the author's own voice and lose the precision scholarship depends on. There are tools called "humanizers," but they are built for blogs and marketing. Run one on a paper or an NSF proposal and it flattens the precision along with everything else. The careful wording academic writing depends on is the first thing to go. So we put together our own. To calibrate it, we had the AI compare its own drafts with our team's accepted papers and funded proposals, and we went through the differences by hand. It is nothing fancy, and it is not about gaming review, defeating detectors, or adding fake novelty. We

academic-writinggrant-writingllmnihnsfresearchscientific-writingwriting-assistant

Quick Facts

Stars863
Forks92
CategoryClaude Skill
Quality Score66.9180337796153/100
Open Issues2
Last Updated2026-07-03
Created2026-06-20
Platformsclaude-code, codex
Est. Tokens~17k

academic-humanizer alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a academic-humanizer alternative? If you're comparing academic-humanizer with other claude skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • claude-prism by delibae · ⭐ 1.8k

    An offline-first scientific writing workspace powered by Claude. LaTeX + Python + 100+ scientific skills all r

  • latex-arxiv-SKILL by appautomaton · ⭐ 434

    A highly customizable agentic harness for arXiv-ready ML/AI review papers (and beyond). It drives agentic AI l

  • research-writing-skill by alfonso0512 · ⭐ 366

    🎓 AI 科研论文写作助手 - 30 个 Prompt 模板覆盖论文写作全流程。支持中英文翻译、润色、文献综述、投稿回复、基金申请等。

  • rigorous by Agentic-Systems-Lab · ⭐ 251

    A comprehensive suite of tools, built to liberate science by making the creation, evaluation, and disseminatio

  • arxiv-mcp-server by blazickjp · ⭐ 3.1k

    A Model Context Protocol server for searching and analyzing arXiv papers

  • chinese-novelist-skill by PenglongHuang · ⭐ 2.8k

    🎭 AI 写小说:从零生成 10-50 章完整中文小说,三层问答 · 创作记忆 · 悬念钩子 · 自动校验,长篇网文连载皆宜|开源免费,适配主流 coding agent|AI novel writing skill

More Claude Skill Tools

Explore other popular claude skill tools:

View all Claude Skill tools →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is academic-humanizer?

academic-humanizer is Strip AI-writing tells from papers and grant proposals (NSF/NIH), while keeping scholarly voice and tying claims to evidence. A skill for Claude Code, Codex, and MorphMind.. It is categorized as a Claude Skill with 863 GitHub stars.

How do I install or use academic-humanizer?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the academic-humanizer GitHub repository at github.com/AIScientists-Dev/academic-humanizer. The project has 863 stars and 92 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to academic-humanizer?

The top alternatives to academic-humanizer on Agent Skills Hub include claude-prism, latex-arxiv-SKILL, research-writing-skill. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Claude Skill tools