by Integral-Healthcare · Agent Tool · ★ 65
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 65 |
| Forks | 5 |
| Language | Shell |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 71/100 |
| Open Issues | 3 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-09 |
| Created | 2023-05-10 |
| Platforms | cli |
| Est. Tokens | ~13k |
Robin AI Named after Batman's assistant, Robin AI is an open source GitHub Action and GitLab CI job that automatically reviews pull requests and merge requests using AI models from OpenAI (GPT) or Anthropic (Claude).
Looking for a robin-ai-reviewer alternative? If you're comparing robin-ai-reviewer with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Cheaper and better Greptile alternative runs on your own github actions.
Open source chat kit engineered for seamless interaction with AI models.
📦️ A repository of OpenAI tools and resources to help developers more easily use OpenAI technologies and ser
The self-hosted AI workflow automation platform for Git repositories.
Context-aware AI reviewer for Pull Requests. Instant summary, line-by-line comments, title generation and more
Ruby Implementation of Nano Bots: small, AI-powered bots that can be easily shared as a single file, designed
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: