loom-notes — security grade SAFE, quality 62/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 62/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by Polaris-Aeterna · Claude Skill · ★ 140

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is loom-notes safe to install? View the security audit →

About loom-notes

🧶 Loom Weave your understanding — a gorgeous XeLaTeX class for fill-in study notes Notes you both read and fill: statements and intuition to take in, blanks and proof-skeletons to work out. Learn by active recall, on paper that looks like an illuminated manuscript. Why Loom Most notes are read-only: definition → theorem → proof, flowing past your eyes. You finish the page and remember nothing. Loom typesets the other layer too — the weave of your own understanding: 🧵 A page is cloth on a loom. Warp threads are the ideas in play (a left selvage rail). Knots are results that bind them (theorem boxes). Loose threads are your open questions. A warmth gauge records how well you actually grok each block. ✍️ Passive + active in one document. The exposition is written to be read; the high-value steps are left blank (), proofs ship as skeletons (), and the book's examples are restaged as "your turn" computations. The source is your answer key. 🎨 Dyed in real pigments. Indigo, madder, weld, iron-gall — his

active-recallclaudeeducationlatexlatex-classlatex-templatelecture-notesmathematicsnote-takingstudy-notes

Quick Facts

Stars140
Forks12
LanguageTeX
CategoryClaude Skill
Quality Score61.7546675463337/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-06-29
Created2026-06-27
Platformsclaude-code
Est. Tokens~17k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with loom-notes for enhanced workflows:

  • beamer-academic — semantic(0.23)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (72%)

loom-notes alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a loom-notes alternative? If you're comparing loom-notes with other claude skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • beamer-academic by Faust-Donf · ⭐ 272

    一键从论文生成高质量学术答辩PPT | AI-powered thesis defense slides generator | Claude Code & Codex Skill

  • Archon by frenzymath · ⭐ 199

    AI-assisted Lean project automation with DAG blueprints, proof orchestration, and multi-agent coding/proving w

  • zettelkasten-mcp by entanglr · ⭐ 162

    A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that implements the Zettelkasten knowledge management methodology, allow

  • papergraph-mcp by lotchuazzz-crypto · ⭐ 134

    PaperGraph MCP turns math papers into evidence-grounded reading maps for AI agents: extract results, trace pro

  • ppt-agent-skill by Akxan · ⭐ 131

    🎨 World-class AI presentation generator · 26 styles · 18 charts · benchmarked against Linear/Anthropic/Stripe

  • humanizer-ru by Vladimir-Human · ⭐ 123

    Проверяемая гигиена вставки из чата для русского текста

More Claude Skill Tools

Explore other popular claude skill tools:

View all Claude Skill tools →

Popular TeX Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is loom-notes?

loom-notes is A gorgeous XeLaTeX class + Claude skill for fill-in study notes — read and fill, learn by active recall.. It is categorized as a Claude Skill with 140 GitHub stars.

What programming language is loom-notes written in?

loom-notes is primarily written in TeX. It covers topics such as active-recall, claude, education.

How do I install or use loom-notes?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the loom-notes GitHub repository at github.com/Polaris-Aeterna/loom-notes. The project has 140 stars and 12 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to loom-notes?

The top alternatives to loom-notes on Agent Skills Hub include beamer-academic, Archon, zettelkasten-mcp. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Claude Skill tools