No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
by Rylaa · Claude Skill · ★ 80
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is fable5-opus5.5-orchestrator safe to install? View the security audit →
Fable Orchestrator Run Claude Fable 5 all day — without watching the usage meter. Fable 5 is the best chair a Claude Code session can have, and the most expensive seat in the house. Let it type every token itself and the session ends rate-limited, waiting out the reset window. This plugin makes the split mechanical. Fable 5 keeps the chair and spends tokens on planning, arbitration and final decisions. Everything else goes to named workers: the volume — implementation, research, briefs, review, bulk reading — to Sonnet 5, and the predictably hard slices — architecture, irreversible migrations, security review — straight to Opus 5.5, which doubles as the escalation lane. The chair sizes each worker's reasoning effort to the job, for mechanical sweeps, for architecture and security — Opus 5.5 never runs at . No ledger, no interview, no mandatory verification phase. Earlier versions gated the act of delegating with a requirements file and a clarification loop. Both are gone. What is left is one rule with teeth: delegation is the default, and a hook notices when the chair quietly does the work itself. The division of labor ┌─────────────────────────────────┐ │ FABLE 5 — chair │ │
| Stars | 80 |
| Forks | 26 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Claude Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 69.371319089726/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-22 |
| Created | 2026-06-12 |
| Platforms | claude-code, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
These tools work well together with fable5-opus5.5-orchestrator for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a fable5-opus5.5-orchestrator alternative? If you're comparing fable5-opus5.5-orchestrator with other claude skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Multi-agent orchestration system for Claude Code with parallel execution, automated quality gates, Board of Di
Make Opus 4.8 (or any Claude model) work like Claude Fable 5 — a Claude Code skill + guard hooks (plan gate, m
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
Claude Fable 5.1 prompting guide as Claude Code skills (KO/EN/ZH). Output quality goes up on Opus 5 and Sonnet
PhD Research Skills for Claude Code: paper reproduction, experiment design, paper review, result comparison an
🤖 A fully autonomous AI company that runs 24/7. 14 AI agents (Bezos, Munger, DHH...) brainstorm ideas, write
Explore other popular claude skill tools:
fable5-opus5.5-orchestrator is Keep Claude Fable 5 in the chair all day without draining your usage limit — token-frugal multi-agent orchestration plugin for Claude Code: tier routing (Sonnet 5 does the work), Requirements Ledger, . It is categorized as a Claude Skill with 80 GitHub stars.
fable5-opus5.5-orchestrator is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as ai-agents, anthropic, claude.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the fable5-opus5.5-orchestrator GitHub repository at github.com/Rylaa/fable5-opus5.5-orchestrator. The project has 80 stars and 26 forks, indicating an active community.
fable5-opus5.5-orchestrator is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to fable5-opus5.5-orchestrator on Agent Skills Hub include conductor-orchestrator-superpowers, fable5-mode, claude-emporium. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: