by SomeStay07 · Claude Skill · ★ 29
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 29 |
| Forks | 2 |
| Category | Claude Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 74/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-02-12 |
| Created | 2026-02-11 |
| Platforms | claude-code |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
Code review agent for Claude Code. One .md file — 14 review categories, 4 severity levels, auto-fix, OWASP security checks. Zero dependencies.
Looking for a code-review-agent alternative? If you're comparing code-review-agent with other claude skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Skills for AI coding agents — Laravel, PHP, React, TypeScript, testing, security, and code quality.
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
An LLM council that reviews your coding agent's every move
Cross-language-safe code-intelligence MCP for AI agents: 13 languages, family-gated call graph, blast radius,
Automated loop driver, slash commands, council automation, MCP browser bridge, and portfolio governance for Cl
Multi-Model Chat — Compare responses from multiple AI models side by side in real-time. Supports GPT, Claude,
Explore other popular claude skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: