by The-Pocket · Agent Tool · ★ 11.3k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 11,282 |
| Forks | 1,212 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 55/100 |
| Open Issues | 77 |
| Last Updated | 2026-07-26 |
| Created | 2024-12-24 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
English 한국어 <a href="https://discor
These tools work well together with PocketFlow for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a PocketFlow alternative? If you're comparing PocketFlow with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Multi-agent systems, memory, planning, reasoning loops
Comprehensive resources on Generative AI, including a detailed roadmap, projects, use cases, interview prepara
Sim is the collaborative workspace to build, deploy, and monitor AI agents and workflows. Used by 100,000+ bui
The Ruby-native AI framework. Chats, agents, tools, images, audio, and video through one consistent API, in pl
Harness LLMs with Multi-Agent Programming
Composio powers 1000+ toolkits, tool search, context management, authentication, and a sandboxed workbench to
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: