by ai-driven-dev · Agent Tool · ★ 169
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 169 |
| Forks | 24 |
| Language | Shell |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 45/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2024-11-23 |
| Created | 2023-11-19 |
| Platforms | cli |
| Est. Tokens | ~1144k |
AI Driven Dev Community La communauté s'est agrandie ! Retrouver désormais la v2 du dépôt dans notre organisation AI-Driven Dev. ❤️
These tools work well together with ai-driven-dev-community for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a ai-driven-dev-community alternative? If you're comparing ai-driven-dev-community with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A memory layer for AI Agents
29 essential agentic design patterns for building intelligent AI systems
A model-driven approach to building AI agents in just a few lines of code.
Agent Cloud is like having your own GPT builder with a bunch extra goodies. The GUI features 1) RAG pipeline w
Giselle: AI App Builder. Open Source.
♊ 50+ selected Gemini prompts with images, multilingual support, and instant gallery preview. Open-source prom
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: