No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
by anthropics · Claude Skill · ★ 6.3k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is claude-code-security-review safe to install? View the security audit →
Featured in: Security Auditing · Agent Security
Claude Code Security Reviewer An AI-powered security review GitHub Action using Claude to analyze code changes for security vulnerabilities. This action provides intelligent, context-aware security analysis for pull requests using Anthropic's Claude Code tool for deep semantic security analysis. See our blog post here for more details. Features AI-Powered Analysis: Uses Claude's advanced reasoning to detect security vulnerabilities with deep semantic understanding Diff-Aware Scanning: For PRs, only analyzes changed files PR Comments: Automatically comments on PRs with security findings Contextual Understanding: Goes beyond pattern matching to understand code semantics Language Agnostic: Works with any programming language False Positive Filtering: Advanced filtering to reduce noise and focus on real vulnerabilities Quick Start Add this to your repository's : yaml name: Security Review permissions: pull-requests: write # Needed for leaving PR comments contents: read on: pullrequest: jobs: security: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: uses: actions/checkout@v4 with: ref: ${{ github.event.pullrequest.head.sha github.sha }} fetch-depth: 2 uses: anthropics/claude-code-security-review@main...
| Stars | 6,292 |
| Forks | 701 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Claude Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 72.5520087414352/100 |
| Open Issues | 100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-02-11 |
| Created | 2025-08-04 |
| Platforms | claude-code, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~6k |
These tools work well together with claude-code-security-review for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a claude-code-security-review alternative? If you're comparing claude-code-security-review with other claude skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Create beautiful slides on the web using a coding agent's frontend skills
Persistent file-based planning for AI coding agents and long-running tasks. Crash-proof markdown plans, sessio
A set of ready to use Agent Skills for research, science, engineering, analysis, finance and writing.
A curated list of awesome Claude Skills, resources, and tools for customizing Claude AI workflows — particular
Comprehensive open-source library of AI research and engineering skills for any AI model. Package the skills a
66 Specialized Skills for Full-Stack Developers. Transform Claude Code into your expert pair programmer.
Explore other popular claude skill tools:
claude-code-security-review is An AI-powered security review GitHub Action using Claude to analyze code changes for security vulnerabilities.. It is categorized as a Claude Skill with 6.3k GitHub stars.
claude-code-security-review is primarily written in Python.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the claude-code-security-review GitHub repository at github.com/anthropics/claude-code-security-review. The project has 6.3k stars and 701 forks, indicating an active community.
claude-code-security-review is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to claude-code-security-review on Agent Skills Hub include frontend-slides, planning-with-files, claude-scientific-skills. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: