by danjdewhurst · Claude Skill · ★ 7
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 7 |
| Forks | 3 |
| Language | Shell |
| Category | Claude Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 71/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-03-04 |
| Created | 2026-01-15 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli |
| Est. Tokens | ~3k |
Catppuccin Frappe status line for Claude Code showing model, git branch, context usage and session cost.
Looking for a cc-status-line alternative? If you're comparing cc-status-line with other claude skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A curated collection of awesome plugins for Claude Code by awesomejun
Vendor-neutral MCP configuration manager — one CLI to add, toggle, and audit MCP servers and skills across eve
Claude Code hooks that auto-switch model tier based on task complexity
CLI tool that generates commit messages from git changes, reviews code for quality issues, and provides debugg
An intelligent CLI tool that intercepts terminal errors and provides instant, context-aware solutions using LL
htop for your AI costs — real-time terminal monitoring of LLM token usage and spending across providers and co
Explore other popular claude skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: