empower-functions — security grade SAFE, quality 69/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 69/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by empower-ai · Agent Tool · ★ 217

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is empower-functions safe to install? View the security audit →

About empower-functions

Empower Functions Empower Functions is a family of LLMs(large language models) that offer GPT-4 level capabilities for real-world "tool using" use cases, with full compatibility support to be served as a drop-in replacement. Live Demo • Huggingface Repo • Website • Discord Update New Empower Functions v1.1 We have just launched new v1.1 of the Empower Functions family. The updated v1.1 family has been fine-tuned based on Llama3.1 using an enhanced curated dataset. It has achieved state-of-the-art performance on the Berkeley Function Calling leader board: (captured on Sep 10, 2024) What is real world "tool using" use cases? "tool using" refers to the ability of LLMs to interact with external APIs by recognizing when a function needs to be called and then generating JSON containing the necessary arguments based on user inputs. This capability is essential for building conversational agents and applications that convert natural language into API calls, facilitating tasks such as weather inquiries, data extraction, and interactions with k

aifunction-callingllama3llmmixtral

Quick Facts

Stars217
Forks17
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
Quality Score68.5630675664641/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2024-10-05
Created2024-05-10
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~87k

empower-functions alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a empower-functions alternative? If you're comparing empower-functions with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • llm-functions by sigoden · ⭐ 766

    Easily create LLM tools and agents using plain Bash/JavaScript/Python functions.

  • dexto by truffle-ai · ⭐ 651

    Agent harness and tookit for building AI agents and agentic applications. CLI and SDKs included

  • llm-axe by emirsahin1 · ⭐ 275

    A simple, intuitive toolkit for quickly implementing LLM powered applications.

  • Promptimizer by austin-starks · ⭐ 211

    An Automated AI-Powered Prompt Optimization Framework

  • cai by ad-si · ⭐ 202

    User friendly CLI tool for AI tasks. Stop thinking about LLMs and prompts, start getting results!

  • ha-claude by Bobsilvio · ⭐ 81

    Home Assistant add-on: Claude Code, OpenAI/GPT, Gemini

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is empower-functions?

empower-functions is GPT-4 level function calling models for real-world tool using use cases. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 217 GitHub stars.

What programming language is empower-functions written in?

empower-functions is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as ai, function-calling, llama3.

How do I install or use empower-functions?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the empower-functions GitHub repository at github.com/empower-ai/empower-functions. The project has 217 stars and 17 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to empower-functions?

The top alternatives to empower-functions on Agent Skills Hub include llm-functions, dexto, llm-axe. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools