Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 300 |
| Forks | 21 |
| Category | AI Tool |
| Quality Score | 49/100 |
| Open Issues | 25 |
| Last Updated | 2025-08-22 |
| Created | 2023-01-12 |
| Est. Tokens | ~3k |
Bito Agentic AI Code Reviews Get codebase-aware feedback in your GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket pull requests or directly in your IDE. Merge PRs 89% faster and ship clean code the first time. No credit card is requred to start a 14-day free trial. Developers start free at https://bito.ai. What is Bito Bito helps engineering teams ship better code, faster, and win back 1 day per sprint.
Looking for a bitoai alternative? If you're comparing bitoai with other ai tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
🚀 AI-powered code review tool for GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket Cloud, Bitbucket Server, Azure DevOps and Gitea —
An AI-powered GitHub code review tool that uses LLMs to detect high-confidence, high-impact issues—such as sec
The self-hosted AI workflow automation platform for Git repositories.
Free, Micro AI Code Reviews That Run on Git Commit
Local AI pull request reviewer — review GitHub and BitBucket PRs right from your terminal, powered by the Clau
Battle-tested Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Cursor configs, plugins, hooks and agents with Kimi, MiniMax and GLM
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: