by hardikpandya · AI Tool · ★ 17.9k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 17,903 |
| Forks | 1,310 |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 55/100 |
| Open Issues | 57 |
| Last Updated | 2026-03-17 |
| Created | 2026-01-11 |
| Est. Tokens | ~2k |
Stop Slop A skill for removing AI tells from prose. What this is AI writing has patterns. Predictable phrases, structures, rhythms. This skill teaches Claude (or any LLM) to catch and remove them. Skill Structure Quick start Claude Code: Add this folder as a skill. Claude Projects: Upload and reference files to project knowledge. Custom instructions: Copy core rules from .
Looking for a stop-slop alternative? If you're comparing stop-slop with other ai tool tools, these 3 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Examples of my Claude Code infrastructure with skill auto-activation, hooks, and agents
This tool has been deprecated. Use Agentic Document Extraction instead.
Visual Skills Pack for Obsidian: generate Canvas, Excalidraw, and Mermaid diagrams from text with Claude Code
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: