by hellogit2021 · AI Tool · ★ 5
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 5 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 49/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-07 |
| Created | 2026-08-29 |
| Platforms | node |
| Est. Tokens | ~6k |
知乎"去AI味写作技巧"社区免费提供：中文写作去 AI 味插件。说"去掉AI味"即重写，说"写的不错"自动学习新 AI 词。
These tools work well together with avoid-ai-writing-cn for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a avoid-ai-writing-cn alternative? If you're comparing avoid-ai-writing-cn with other ai tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Transform AI-generated text into natural human-like content. 100% offline · 25 languages · Zero dependencies ·
中文去 AI 味与文采增强 Codex Skill，汲取 Mengke / 好事风格，让中文草稿更像人写。
AI humanizer skill for Claude Code, Codex and Cursor. Removes AI slop and the signs of AI writing, then measur
Agent Dashboard: Visualization and analytics for Sessions and Quota Usage. Track, analyze, and optimize token
在 DeepSeek Harness / Claude Code / Cursor / Codex / Gemini CLI 里直接搜索 20 个中国开放平台的 65,600+ 篇 API 文档；零配置，支持 Skill
对抗模型输出不良表达习惯的 Agent Skill
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: