correctless — security grade SAFE, quality 67/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 67/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by joshft · Claude Skill · ★ 66

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is correctless safe to install? View the security audit →

About correctless

Correctless Composable Claude Code skills that enforce a correctness-oriented development workflow. Spec before you code. Test before you implement. Never let an agent grade its own work. The Problem AI coding assistants are fast but sloppy. They write code that works for the happy path, skip edge cases, and silently introduce bugs that don't surface until production. The same model that wrote the code will review it and say "looks good" — because it's confirming its own decisions. Correctless fixes this by structuring the workflow so that every phase is executed by a different agent with a different lens: The spec agent asks "what does correct mean?" and researches current best practices before any code exists The review agent reads the spec cold and checks for security gaps, unstated assumptions, and untestable rules The tes

ai-developmentai-workflowclaudeclaude-codecode-qualitydeveloper-toolssecuritytdd

Quick Facts

Stars66
Forks2
LanguageShell
CategoryClaude Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score67.4173466539555/100
Open Issues94
Last Updated2026-09-04
Created2026-03-27
Platformsclaude-code, cli
Est. Tokens~15k

correctless alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a correctless alternative? If you're comparing correctless with other claude skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • optimus-claude by oprogramadorreal · ⭐ 75

    Primes your project for peak Claude Code performance

  • orchestkit by yonatangross · ⭐ 286

    The Complete AI Development Toolkit for Claude Code. 106 skills, 36 agents, 171 hooks. Install `ork` for stabl

  • task-orchestrator by jpicklyk · ⭐ 207

    Server-enforced workflow discipline for AI agents. An MCP server providing persistent work items, dependency g

  • meridian by markmdev · ⭐ 185

    Zero-config Claude Code setup with enforced task scaffolding, structured memory, persistent context after comp

  • claude-code by PaulDuvall · ⭐ 109

    Transform Claude Code into a complete development platform with AI-powered commands that automate your entire

  • alfred-dev by 686f6c61 · ⭐ 104

    Tu equipo de desarrolladores en un plugin. 10 agentes, 11 skills planas, 18 comandos /alfred-dev:*. Memoria pe

More Claude Skill Tools

Explore other popular claude skill tools:

View all Claude Skill tools →

Popular Shell Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is correctless?

correctless is The agent that writes the code never reviews it. Spec-driven TDD with agent separation, adversarial QA, and dynamic rigor for Claude Code.. It is categorized as a Claude Skill with 66 GitHub stars.

What programming language is correctless written in?

correctless is primarily written in Shell. It covers topics such as ai-development, ai-workflow, claude.

How do I install or use correctless?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the correctless GitHub repository at github.com/joshft/correctless. The project has 66 stars and 2 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does correctless use?

correctless is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to correctless?

The top alternatives to correctless on Agent Skills Hub include optimus-claude, orchestkit, task-orchestrator. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Claude Skill tools