by kawaiipantsu · Agent Tool · ★ 10
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Flagged: sudo usage. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 10 |
| Forks | 3 |
| Language | C++ |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 71/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-01-07 |
| Created | 2026-01-05 |
| Platforms | browser, claude-code |
| Est. Tokens | ~12k |
This tool is an implementation of the Telegram Bot API for Linux terminal use. It's ment for quick OSINT and grading useful information or to do things like takedown, destroy or grab messages. Note, this tool is converted from a web-tool I once made to C++ and done so via Claude.
Looking for a telegramdigger alternative? If you're comparing telegramdigger with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
An intelligent CLI tool that intercepts terminal errors and provides instant, context-aware solutions using LL
AI-powered penetration testing MCP server
AI-native security toolkit — fray go target.com scans everything. 7,800+ payloads, 98 WAF vendors, 42+ recon c
Personal intelligence agent powered by Claude Code. Describe what to watch, it collects, analyzes, and learns
Comprehensive guide to AI applications in OSINT workflows and intelligence analysis
Telegram bridge for Claude Code and Codex CLI
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: