by livlign · Claude Skill · ★ 9
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 9 |
| Forks | 2 |
| Language | Go |
| Category | Claude Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 64/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-10 |
| Created | 2026-06-01 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, go |
| Est. Tokens | ~19k |
Session-awareness status line for Claude Code. A kaomoji face reads the transcript and narrates state across your sessions. One Go binary, no hooks, no daemons.
Looking for a ccbit alternative? If you're comparing ccbit with other claude skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Process manager for AI agents (and humans)
Monitor Claude Code sessions, costs, config, hooks, agents & MCP servers from a single Rust binary — TUI (9 ta
Claude Code statusline plugin for 5-hour/7-day quota, context usage, tokens, and reset countdowns in your term
A verification-first engineering toolkit for Claude Code. Built for senior ICs and tech leads who already know
✋ Interactive CLI tool for selecting and bundling code into a single, LLM-ready output file
See what your AI coding agent is doing. Multi-provider assistant & session monitor for VS Code and the termina
Explore other popular claude skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: