gem-team — security grade SAFE, quality 59/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 59/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by mubaidr · Agent Tool · ★ 225

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is gem-team safe to install? View the security audit →

About gem-team

💎 Gem Team Multi-agent orchestration framework for spec-driven development and automated verification. Turning Model Quality into System Quality. 🚀 Quick Start Install Now for Code See all installation options below. 🤔 Why Gem Team? ⚡ 4x Faster — Parallel execution with wave-based execution 🏆 Higher Quality — Specialized agents + TDD + verification gates + contract-first 🔒 Built-in Security — OWASP scanning, secrets/PII detection on critical tasks 👁️ Full Visibility — Real-time status, clear approval gates 🛡️ Resilient — Pre-mortem analysis, failure handling, auto-replanning ♻️ Pattern Reuse — Codebase pattern discovery prevents reinventing wheels 📏 Established Patterns — Uses library/framework conventions over custom implementations 🪞 Self-Correcting

ai-agentsautomationclaude-codecode-reviewcursordeveloper-toolsdevopse2e-testinggithub-copilotharness

Quick Facts

Stars225
Forks20
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseApache-2.0
Quality Score58.6294602812054/100
Last Updated2026-10-02
Created2026-01-12
Platformsclaude-code
Est. Tokens~19k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with gem-team for enhanced workflows:

  • correctless — semantic(0.30)+complementary+rare_topics+similar_pop+shared_platform (55%)
  • plamen — semantic(0.18)+complementary+rare_topics+similar_pop+shared_platform (51%)

gem-team alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a gem-team alternative? If you're comparing gem-team with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • hcom by aannoo · ⭐ 530

    Let AI agents message, watch, and spawn each other across terminals. Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity CLI, Curs

  • sub-agents-mcp by shinpr · ⭐ 98

    Define task-specific AI sub-agents in Markdown for any MCP-compatible tool.

  • claude-code-skills by levnikolaevich · ⭐ 567

    Help your AI agent finish the job: solve the right problem, keep changes focused, and show what was verified.

  • agent-skills by jdrhyne · ⭐ 241

    A collection of AI agent skills for Clawdbot, Claude Code, Codex

  • nanostack by garagon · ⭐ 205

    A workflow harness that helps AI coding agents plan, review, test, and ship safer code.

  • sdd-pilot by attilaszasz · ⭐ 95

    Replace chaotic AI code generation with a disciplined, spec-driven workflow. SDD Pilot enforces structured dev

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is gem-team?

gem-team is Turn AI coding into an engineering process.. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 225 GitHub stars.

How do I install or use gem-team?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the gem-team GitHub repository at github.com/mubaidr/gem-team. The project has 225 stars and 20 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does gem-team use?

gem-team is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to gem-team?

The top alternatives to gem-team on Agent Skills Hub include hcom, sub-agents-mcp, claude-code-skills. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools