by nexibeo · Agent Tool · ★ 37
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 37 |
| Forks | 3 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 66/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-26 |
| Created | 2026-09-19 |
| Platforms | browser, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
Practical, tested recipes for TypeSafe's Jev decision model on OpenRouter: support triage, database indexing, file organizing, tagging, taxonomies, dedupe, PII detection, extraction, search re-ranking and a browser agent.
Looking for a jev-cookbook alternative? If you're comparing jev-cookbook with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
An unofficial local visualizer for Jev (TypeSafe): a live view of every call your code makes. Not affiliated w
A self-hosted API and web interface for Laya’s structured decision models, compatible with the TypeSafe Jev AP
Ask your house a question, get a number back. Home Assistant integration for TypeSafe Jev: typed answers as se
A browser agent with a Google Chrome extension that can work in your browser. Based on Google Gemini 2.5 compu
🔥🔥 Papers, open reproductions and independent evaluations behind System One models and Jev.
Stops AI coding agents from claiming work is done without evidence. Deterministic hooks decide, TypeSafe's Jev
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: