by probelabs · Claude Skill · ★ 6
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 6 |
| Forks | 2 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | Claude Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 72/100 |
| Last Updated | 2025-09-08 |
| Created | 2025-08-28 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
Remote control and approval system for Claude Code via Telegram. Zero dependencies, Node.js 18+ built-ins only.
Looking for a afk alternative? If you're comparing afk with other claude skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Run your coding agents from Telegram. A bridge for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode and Pi: send tasks by text or
The coding agent you don’t have to watch. Start a task and walk away. AFK builds the feature, verifies its own
Automatic context preservation for Claude Code. Never lose work to compaction again. 7 hooks, 187 semantic pat
Vendor-neutral MCP configuration manager — one CLI to add, toggle, and audit MCP servers and skills across eve
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
Explore other popular claude skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: