video-vox — security grade SAFE, quality 54/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 54/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by santmun · AI Tool · ★ 32

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is video-vox safe to install? View the security audit →

About video-vox

Crea shorts verticales animados estilo Vox sobre cualquier tema con Claude Code + Remotion (cartoon + voz + música + SFX)

Quick Facts

Stars32
Forks8
LanguageJavaScript
CategoryAI Tool
Quality Score53.9888094554431/100
Last Updated2026-07-14
Created2026-07-11
Platformsclaude-code, node
Est. Tokens~7k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with video-vox for enhanced workflows:

  • marketing-studio — semantic(0.28)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (60%)
  • remotion-ads — semantic(0.27)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (60%)

More AI Tool Tools

Explore other popular ai tool tools:

View all AI Tool tools →

Popular JavaScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is video-vox?

video-vox is Crea shorts verticales animados estilo Vox sobre cualquier tema con Claude Code + Remotion (cartoon + voz + música + SFX). It is categorized as a AI Tool with 32 GitHub stars.

What programming language is video-vox written in?

video-vox is primarily written in JavaScript.

How do I install or use video-vox?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the video-vox GitHub repository at github.com/santmun/video-vox. The project has 32 stars and 8 forks, indicating an active community.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse AI Tool tools