by shehab267 · Claude Skill · ★ 5
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 5 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | Claude Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 68/100 |
| Open Issues | 4 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-01 |
| Created | 2026-07-07 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
Minimal, configurable status line for Claude Code — context, tokens, cost and rate limits at a glance in your terminal.
Looking for a ccbrief alternative? If you're comparing ccbrief with other claude skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Track and rotate your Claude & Codex usage across accounts from one live dashboard — read live, never spending
Analyze your Claude Code context window, detect wasted tokens, and get pasteable fix commands. Zero API calls
htop for your AI costs — real-time terminal monitoring of LLM token usage and spending across providers and co
Process manager for AI agents (and humans)
Know your quota before you hit the wall. The only pace-aware statusline for Claude Code.
AI coding runtime hygiene for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, MCP servers, and safe workspace caches. Tr
Explore other popular claude skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: