by syiibfs-hash · MCP Server · ★ 1
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 1 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 56/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-04 |
| Created | 2026-05-28 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~5k |
Local-first memory engine for coding agents (Claude Code/Cursor/Codex): SQLite+FTS5 retrieval, versioned bi-temporal memories, full-session capture, zero dependencies, MCP server
Looking for a cc-agent-brain alternative? If you're comparing cc-agent-brain with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
The recorder for your AI conversations — local-first MCP memory that keeps byte-exact copies of your Claude Co
Local-first AI memory archive. Import ChatGPT, Claude, and Grok exports, generate semantic embeddings, and sea
Outcome-based persistent memory MCP server for Claude Code and OpenCode. Good advice promoted, bad advice demo
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
Local-first AI knowledge layer. Extract architecture, query from any AI tool via MCP. Private by architecture.
Local citation-backed recall for Pi, OMP, Claude Code, Codex, and ChatGPT history.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: