by yulonghe97 · Claude Skill · ★ 146
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
npx skills add yulonghe97/draw-architecture
npx skills add yulonghe97/draw-architecture -gTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 146 |
| Forks | 13 |
| Language | HTML |
| Category | Claude Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 64/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-08-25 |
| Created | 2026-08-11 |
| Platforms | claude-code |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
draw-architecture An agent skill that turns any system architecture — a codebase, an architecture doc, or a plain-English description — into an interactive, explorable canvas diagram: dark, monospaced, organized into colour-coded planes, with pan/zoom, click-to-isolate focus, and PNG export. One self-contained HTML file, ready to share or publish.
These tools work well together with draw-architecture for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a draw-architecture alternative? If you're comparing draw-architecture with other claude skill tools, these 2 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Repo for the Claude Code Marketplace to use with the Claude for Life Sciences Launch. This will continue to ho
Report issues related to MCP integration with Claude here.
Explore other popular claude skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: