by zerobootdev · Agent Tool · ★ 2.5k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 2,467 |
| Forks | 107 |
| Language | Rust |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 65/100 |
| Open Issues | 12 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-18 |
| Created | 2026-03-15 |
| Platforms | rust |
| Est. Tokens | ~22k |
Sub-millisecond VM sandboxes for AI agents via copy-on-write forking Try it Benchmarks Each sandbox is a real KVM virtual machine with hardware-enforced memory isolation. How it works Firecracker sn
These tools work well together with zeroboot for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a zeroboot alternative? If you're comparing zeroboot with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Run thousands of AI agent sandboxes on the cheapest machines.
Isolated VM environment for running Claude Code and Codex
Give coding agents a disposable Linux VM, not your laptop
All-in-one LLM CLI tool featuring Shell Assistant, Chat-REPL, RAG, AI Tools & Agents, with access to OpenAI, C
agent runtime security - zero trust, zero setup, zero latency agent sandboxing
Robust, fast, scalable, and sandboxed open-source online code execution system for humans and AI.
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: