by Valen-Team · Agent Tool · ★ 874
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 874 |
| Forks | 85 |
| Language | Jupyter Notebook |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 58/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-22 |
| Created | 2026-09-23 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~19k |
A multimodal decision model inspired by Jev — text, images and video in; decision probabilities out. <img
These tools work well together with Valen for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a Valen alternative? If you're comparing Valen with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Turn any LLM into a Jev-style decision model: typed decisions, real probabilities, no training. (continue upda
The open-source System One decision model. Sub-15ms, non-autoregressive, local drop-in alternative to TypeSafe
Awesome Jev: source-backed open-source ecosystem radar, plain-language project discovery, and automatic GitHub
1207 public resources for Jev, TypeSafe AI's System One decision model, indexed by decision pattern. Source ci
Awesome list of TypeSafe AI Jev use cases: 74 demos ranked by likes, 150+ GitHub repos, limits, cost and API e
Open-source, local-first social media research agent for Instagram, TikTok, and LinkedIn. Jev routes read-only
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: