ReadAny — security grade SAFE, quality 66/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 66/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by codedogQBY · Agent Tool · ★ 2.4k

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is ReadAny safe to install? View the security audit →

About ReadAny

ReadAny Local-first AI e-book reader for desktop and mobile "Why do I forget what I read? Why are my notes scattered? Why can I only search by keywords?" ReadAny helps you ask questions about books, find ideas by meaning, and build a private reading knowledge base with RAG chat, semantic search, highlights, TTS, and WebDAV sync. 🚀 v2.0 Update: Mobile apps (iOS/Android) now available! See Mobile section below. AI-Native Reading

aianthropicebook-readerembeddingsepub-readerexpoknowledge-managementllmlocal-firstollama

Quick Facts

Stars2,353
Forks183
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryAgent Tool
Quality Score66.4118451586435/100
Open Issues342
Last Updated2026-09-10
Created2026-02-25
Platformsbrowser, node
Est. Tokens~17k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with ReadAny for enhanced workflows:

  • shadcn-ui-mcp-server — semantic(0.17)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (65%)
  • ethora — semantic(0.20)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (62%)
  • mcp-local-rag — semantic(0.30)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (60%)
  • SocratiCode — semantic(0.25)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (59%)
  • glean — semantic(0.25)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (59%)

ReadAny alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a ReadAny alternative? If you're comparing ReadAny with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • honcho by plastic-labs · ⭐ 7.0k

    Memory library for building stateful agents

  • ruby_llm by crmne · ⭐ 4.4k

    The Ruby-native AI framework. Chats, agents, tools, images, audio, and video through one consistent API, in pl

  • voltagent by VoltAgent · ⭐ 10.4k

    AI Agent Engineering Platform built on an Open Source TypeScript AI Agent Framework

  • argo by xark-argo · ⭐ 814

    ARGO is an open-source AI Agent platform that brings Local Manus to your desktop. With one-click model downloa

  • fragments by e2b-dev · ⭐ 6.4k

    Open-source Next.js template for building apps that are fully generated by AI. By E2B.

  • sdk-python by strands-agents · ⭐ 6.0k

    A model-driven approach to building AI agents in just a few lines of code.

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is ReadAny?

ReadAny is AI-powered cross-platform e-book reader with semantic search, RAG chat, local vector store, notes, TTS, and WebDAV sync.. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 2.4k GitHub stars.

What programming language is ReadAny written in?

ReadAny is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as ai, anthropic, ebook-reader.

How do I install or use ReadAny?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the ReadAny GitHub repository at github.com/codedogQBY/ReadAny. The project has 2.4k stars and 183 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to ReadAny?

The top alternatives to ReadAny on Agent Skills Hub include honcho, ruby_llm, voltagent. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools